Judging from this blog's header, you will have guessed it already:
I am an iPod owner. Do I use it a lot? Nah. Not any more. And I guess I am not the only one in this.
I bought it a year ago to bring all my (digitalized) music with me on a 3-month shipboard expedition to the Weddell Sea. It was great, I could listen to every track I owned (and soon to a few new ones - figure it out yourself...) without having to bring stacks of CD's or other media in my already extensive personal baggage. For some time, I was even running games from it taking advantage of the FW/USB connection, which was surprisingly decent even for a 1-person-shooter that I did not have enough disk space for on my (work) laptop. And of course I could save backups of all my data to the drive as well (my initial excuse to buy this in the first place ;-)
I admit that I am a great fan of multi-purpose devices and purchases. Things that DO more than one thing are definitely cooler than things that do only one thing. So I admit to be a follower of the "swiss army knife faith" ... ;-)
But now I am one of the Lost Generation, together with (probably) millions of other people:
a pre-photo (ugh!) pre-video (argh!) iPod owner - who doesn't even use the darn thing a lot any more. Outdated.
And that got me thinking:
Really? Should I now be a Good Consumer and Update Myself?
_____________________________________________________
So let's see:
The iPod photo cannot only play music and store files but can also show all my (stored) pics. Hm.
The iPod video can all that, PLUS let me watch video clips. Er, okay. Its screen is bigger and better, too. Nice.
____________________________________________________
I have to say that I'll pass on the photos - I really do not see the point, I am sorry - reduce a pic to THAT size and look at it there, instead of on a proper screen? Why would anybody want to do that?
I was also sceptical to the video part, although I thought "well, maybe blogs or podcasts might work". So I started looking for an interesting example to watch (on my PowerBook) to see whether it was all worth it. Or at least any good. The following example is a video blog/podcast about a guy driving to work. And back. With videoed monologue or interview sequences. Judge for yourself, here it is:
DriveTimeFor me this resulted in one basic observation: the content (the blog) is low-res standard and semi-interesting material (sorry, Ravi) and not suitable to watch on a "big" screen (it all breaks up in swaths of pixels). I do not mean to say that this is a representative sample of what video blog (vlogs, I hear they call them now) content is about, but it probably represents the style and certainly the technical specs and standards available to the, right!, the vloggers (yeah, I know how it sounds...).
So is the iPod principle - making a 'superior' music player/storage device/photo+video display unit - really just a rip-off as people say? High-priced packaging for low-quality content? Wouldn't a cheap plastic USB stick with a phone jack (you know, the sort of thing that looks like a disposable lighter, only bulkier) do just the same job, play low-def tunes downloaded from the net while working out/commuting/jogging/walking the dog etc.?
Looking at the numbers of purchased songs from iTunes compared to the number of iPods sold I would always have rejected that idea: there are WAY too many iPods around for that given amount of (legally) downloaded and shared music from iTunes and others. So people were presumably loading their own music (let's hope in the highest available encoding quality) on their players to carry them all around in a pocket. I really bought into this idea (having 400$ worth of proof in my hand ;-)
But a 'new' device capable of displaying mediocre-to-poor-standard video looks like a bad deal to me.
Maybe the swiss army knife that cuts, files, pulls screws and opens beer and wine bottles is a great invention.
But a portable music player that runs video sounds like a pocket knife that also is a chain saw: you can cut your toothpicks into smaller toothpicks. Half a toothpick, anyone?
Labels: Strange Stuff